White House or Dog House for Senator Feingold?

                                                March 17, 2006

 

Those of you who know me personally know that I support President Bush, but I am at odds with him on a few issues. I didn’t support him on the Dubai World Ports deal, and I don’t support his stance on amnesty for illegal immigrants.

But I certainly can’t go along with junior Democratic Senator Russell Feingold from Wisconsin, to either censure or impeach the president over domestic spying. Although Feingold is verbally chastising his party for not embracing his ridiculous proposal–right now he is the "lone ranger" as the Democrats distance themselves claiming they are awaiting the investigation by the Senate Intelligence Committee, to see if President Bush overstepped his boundary when ordering "wiretapping" as a means to try and track terrorists associated with al-Qaida down.

If another attack by terrorists can be foiled by using strategic wiretapping initiatives, I’m all for it. I believe there have been several attacks already thwarted that could have resulted in another devastating loss of lives here in America. Besides, nothing like being forewarned so we can be forearmed.

I don’t have a problem whatsoever accepting that my phone conversations may be monitored. I have nothing to hide, and what good is privacy if you’re on a big jet heading for a skyscraper or the White House with a terrorist piloting the plane? Your privacy will certainly be invaded when they are looking for identification to identify your remains, if there is anything left to work with beyond ashes.

The Democrats have never gotten over the fact that one of their own was impeached. Never mind that former President Bill Clinton deserved to be ousted from office. So, talks of impeaching President Bush is nothing new. Plus, they are still grumpy over Bush winning the election over Al Gore, and elected for a second term by a landslide.

What I find more troubling than anything else: is the movement to undermine the president’s aggressive approach to keep our enemies at bay. Although the stance he took on Dubai still has me puzzled. I can only attribute that to his receiving bad advice about the possible boost to the economy a middle-east country takeover of our ports would produce.

There is a rumor going around that Senator Feingold is interested in running for president in 2008. Many see his proposal to censure or impeach the president as grandstanding or paving the way to the White House.

Well, Senator Feinstein–you might have to settle for the dog house–instead!
                                                      "No Safety Net!"

                                                        March 26, 2006

President George H. Bush while in office, made a speech claiming: "there is a safety net for those Americans who need medical help and cannot afford it." I’ve found there is "no safety net!" I’ve heard from many of you on and off the air who have worked hard all of your lives, paid taxes, social security and been a productive member of society only to find when a serious illness came your way, your income and savings were depleted. And there is no money left for insurance or prescription drugs. Since you have paid into the system you seek help only to find out there is very little help, and the so-called safety net offers no security, because it is full of holes to fall through.

A listener from North Carolina, age 61, worked 33 years for one company. They reached a very responsible position, being in charge of overseeing the business in half of North Carolina and Virginia. They had quadruple by-pass surgery, went back to work six weeks later, and continued to work for three years until company relocated their offices. This lady has multiple health problems, diabetes being one of them. She wanted to work, however due to age (yeah I know employers are told not to discriminate against age–at least openly) and health problems, she couldn’t work. At this point she applied for "disability." She was a prime candidate, needing help. However, she was turned down three times. She finally hired a lawyer and just recently received her first disability check. The process took almost two years. Would you call this a safety net? I don’t think so. Her husband is a few years older than she is, and had retired, but he had to find employment to put food on the table and buy medication.

Another listener from Virginia, went to her doctor and was told she had a tumor the size of a grapefruit in her stomach. The doctor referred her to a female surgeon, who wanted cash for the consultation in the amount of $165.00 and 50% of the cost of surgery up front. The woman resides in Pulaski, Virginia and was 57-years- old at the time and had been working. She had insurance, until her employment ended. She didn’t have the 50% cash for the operation. Friends tried to find help for her. Finally, she was told if she could be in the University of Virginia Emergency Room, Charlottesville, Virginia, on May 1, 2005 there may be enough money for her operation. I’m thankful to report she was there, the operation was a success, however she was told if she had not been operated on she would not have lived two more weeks.

The two examples I’ve just given, were people who were productive members of society as long as they were able, however when they needed a safety net it was full of holes! We need to be far more concerned about our disabled and elderly. Let your elected officials hear concern over this very important issue.

The new Medicare Law doesn’t go far enough. If foreign aid is cut around 95% we can take care of needy Americans like these dear ladies!